Diabetes Therapy · 2018 · 17 citations · 43 references
PharmacyEndocrinologyPharmacotherapyCost-effectiveness AnalysisMeta-analysisPharmacoeconomic ModelingCost-effectiveness ComparisonCost-effectiveness ModelingDiabetes MellitusDiabetes PharmacotherapyGlycemic ControlIncretin-based TherapiesCost-effectivenessDiabetes Medication UseDirect Treatment CostsGlucagon-like PeptidesHemoglobin LevelsLong-term Cost-benefit AnalysisLong-term Cost-effectiveness ModelingLong-term Effectiveness
INTRODUCTION: Once-weekly semaglutide is a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes that was associated with greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and body mass index (BMI) versus once-daily GLP-1 analogue liraglutide in a recent network meta-analysis (NMA). The aim of the present study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus liraglutide 1.2 mg in Estonia. METHODS: Outcomes were projected over patient lifetimes using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model (version 9.0), with baseline cohort characteristics sourced from SUSTAIN 3 and changes in HbA1c, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and BMI associated with once-weekly semaglutide and liraglutide derived from the NMA. Patients were assumed to receive once-weekly semaglutide or liraglutide for 5 years before intensifying to basal insulin. Treatment effects were applied for the first 5 years, after which HbA1c increased to 7.0%, SBP followed a natural progression, and BMI reverted to baseline for the remainder of the analysis. Costs were expressed in euros (EUR) and estimated from a healthcare payer perspective. Utilities associated with diabetes and diabetes-related complications were taken from published sources. RESULTS: Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.13 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus liraglutide 1.2 mg. Direct costs were EUR 67 higher with once-weekly semaglutide, due to the increased acquisition cost, but this was mostly offset by cost savings due to avoidance of diabetes-related complications. Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was therefore associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of EUR 523 per QALY gained versus liraglutide 1.2 mg, which falls well below a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 52,390 per QALY gained (three times the Estonian GDP per capita). CONCLUSION: Once-weekly semaglutide was considered highly cost-effective versus liraglutide 1.2 mg for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in Estonia. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S. Plain language summary available for this article.
43
International Diabetes Federation 2017
Ann M. Carracher, Payal H. Marathe, Kelly L. Close · Journal of Diabetes · 2018 · 13.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Endocrinology, Diabetology +11
R. C. Turner, Charles Fox, Matthews et al. · The Lancet · 1998 · 8.4K citations
10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes
Rury R. Holman, Sanjoy K. Paul, M. Angelyn Bethel et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2008 · 7.8K citations · Full text