BMC Cancer · 2018 · 29 citations · 24 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologyHybrid ImagingTreatment PlanningAdaptive RadiotherapyComputed TomographyComputed Tomography Dose ManagementRadiation TherapyRadiation Treatment PlanningTreatment Planning Dose CalculationAdaptive Radiation Therapy PlanningAdaptive Radiotherapy Dose PrescriptionAdaptive Radiotherapy DosimetryAdaptive Radiotherapy PlanningClinical Target Volume CoverageRadiation Dose ReductionRadiotherapy Plan EvaluationTotal Dose
BACKGROUND: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has potential benefits in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). This retrospective study aimed to identify the factors favoring ART. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty NPC patients were retrospectively included in this study. All patients received two-phase, volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and underwent a second computed tomography (CT) for the phase II ART. We generated phantom, non-ART plans by a hybrid method for comparison with ART plans. A paired t-test was used to evaluate the dose differences between these two plans. A subgroup analysis through a paired t-test was used to evaluate the factors favoring ART. RESULTS: of PTV-1, the factors of a large initial weight (> 60 kg, p < 0.000), large body mass index (BMI) (> 21.5, p < 0.000), obvious weight loss (> 2.8 kg, p < 0.000), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (p < 0.000), and stages III-IV (p < 0.000) favored the use of ART. CONCLUSIONS: ART could significantly reduce the mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland. ART has dosimetrical benefit for patients with a heavy initial weight, large BMI, obvious weight loss, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and cancer in stages III-IV.
24
Dora L.�W. Kwong, Anne S. McMillan, May Chun Mei Wong et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2006 · 744 citations
Gang Peng, Tao Wang, Kunyu Yang et al. · Radiotherapy and Oncology · 2012 · 644 citations