NeuroImage Clinical · 2018 · 217 citations · 22 references
MedicineNeurologyNeuroscienceNeuroplasticityRehabilitationStroke RehabilitationMotor Control AssessmentMotor RecoveryNeurological Physical TherapyNeurological RehabilitationStrokeStroke ImagingLow-frequency StimulationMotor DeficitsMotor Function DeficitsMotor Recovery After StrokePost-stroke Motor RecoveryPost-stroke Motor RehabilitationStroke-related Motor RecoveryTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can modulate cortical excitability, and may be beneficial for motor recovery after stroke. However, the neuroplasticity effects of rTMS have not been thoroughly investigated in the early stage after stroke. OBJECTIVE: To comprehensively assess the effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulations on motor recovery in early stroke patients, using a randomized controlled trial based on clinical, neurophysiological and functional imaging assessments. METHODS: Sixty hospitalized, first-ever ischemic stroke patients (within 2 weeks after stroke) with motor deficits were randomly allocated to receive, in addition to standard physical therapy, five consecutive sessions of either: (1) High-frequency (HF) rTMS at 10 Hz over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1); (2) Low-frequency (LF) rTMS at 1 Hz over the contralesional M1; (3) sham rTMS. The primary outcome measure was a motor impairment score (Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer) evaluated at baseline, after rTMS intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. Cortical excitability and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data were obtained within 24 h before and after rTMS intervention. Analyses of variance were conducted to compare the recovery effects among the three rTMS groups, assessed using clinical, neurophysiological and fMRI tests. RESULTS: Motor improvement was significantly larger in the two rTMS groups than in the control group. The HF-rTMS group showed significantly increased cortical excitability and motor-evoked fMRI activation in ipsilesional motor areas, whereas the LF-rTMS group had significantly decreased cortical excitability and motor-evoked fMRI activation in contralesional motor areas. Activity in ipsilesional motor cortex significantly correlated with motor function, after intervention as well as at 3-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: HF- and LF-rTMS can both improve motor function by modulating motor cortical activation in the early phase of stroke.
22
Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: a clinical examination scale.
Thomas Brott, Harold P. Adams, Charles P. Olinger et al. · Stroke · 1989 · 5.8K citations
Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke
Nagako Murase, Julie Duqué, Riccardo Mazzocchio et al. · Annals of Neurology · 2004 · 1.5K citations
Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity
Cathy M. Stinear, P. Alan Barber, Peter Smale et al. · Brain · 2006 · 868 citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +17
Improving the Assessment of Outcomes in Stroke
Lindsay Wilson, Asha Hareendran, Marie Grant et al. · Stroke · 2002 · 855 citations
Nancy E. Mayo, Sharon Wood-Dauphinée, Sara Ahmed et al. · Disability and Rehabilitation · 1999 · 550 citations
Education, Rehabilitation Medicine, Physical Disabilities +16