High-Grade Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Carcinoma Management and Outcomes: A National Cancer Database Study

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas are rare in the gastrointestinal tract. However, treatment patterns and outcomes have not been well described. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was analyzed. The primary objective was to describe the clinical outcomes and identify prognostic factors. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to identify factors associated with patient outcome. RESULTS: < .034) were associated with improved survival. Multivariable analysis confirmed prognostic advantage of treatment at an academic center. CONCLUSION: This is the largest series of HG GI NEC. Most patients present with metastatic disease, and overall survival remains poor. Treatment at an academic center, younger age, and use of chemotherapy were associated with improved survival. Multiagent chemotherapy was found to be associated with superior survival compared with single-agent chemotherapy, which was superior to no chemotherapy. Temporal sequences of chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation administration were not found to be associated with survival differences on multivariable analysis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Management of patients with high-grade gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinomas (HG GI NEC) is based on experience with small-cell lung cancer. In this retrospective review, most patients had advanced disease and pancreatic primary had worse outcomes. Treatment at an academic center, younger age, and use of chemotherapy are associated with improved survival. Patients with early-stage disease treated with resection alone had inferior outcomes compared with patients who received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, suggesting that micrometastases contribute to poor surgical outcomes. The relatively high proportion of positive surgical margin favors downstaging with neoadjuvant therapy to improve resection and lower the risk of systemic recurrence.