A risk of bias instrument for non-randomized studies of exposures: A users' guide to its application in the context of GRADE

TLDR

The instrument is modeled on the ROBINS‑I tool for non‑randomized studies of interventions. The paper explains how to apply, interpret, and present the new risk‑of‑bias instrument for non‑randomized studies of environmental exposures. The instrument evaluates bias by comparing each exposure study to a hypothetical randomized target experiment, and the paper provides step‑by‑step guidance for formulating questions, making judgments, conducting sensitivity analyses, and integrating the assessments into the GRADE framework.

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to explain how to apply, interpret, and present the results of a new instrument to assess the risk of bias (RoB) in non-randomized studies (NRS) dealing with effects of environmental exposures on health outcomes. This instrument is modeled on the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) instrument. The RoB instrument for NRS of exposures assesses RoB along a standardized comparison to a randomized target experiment, instead of the study-design directed RoB approach. We provide specific guidance for the integral steps of developing a research question and target experiment, distinguishing issues of indirectness from RoB, making individual-study judgments, and performing and interpreting sensitivity analyses for RoB judgments across a body of evidence. Also, we present an approach for integrating the RoB assessments within the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to assess the certainty of the evidence in the systematic review. Finally, we guide the reader through an overall assessment to support the rating of all domains that determine the certainty of a body of evidence using the GRADE approach.