BMC Medicine · 2018 · 55 citations · 30 references
Public HealthInfectious Disease ControlPharmacologyAntimicrobial PharmacotherapyClinical PharmacologyInfectious Disease PharmacotherapyDrug Safety MonitoringMalariaNeglected Tropical DiseasesPharmacoepidemiologyTropical MedicineAntimalarial Drug CombinationsAntimalarial Drug DevelopmentIntervention ContextMalaria ChemoprophylaxisMalaria EliminationMalaria ParasitesMalaria ProphylaxisTreatment Of Malaria
BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) has the potential to interrupt malaria transmission and has been suggested as a tool for malaria elimination in low-endemic settings. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness and safety of two rounds of MDA in Zanzibar, a pre-elimination setting. METHODS: A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 16 areas considered as malaria hotspots, with an annual parasite index of > 0.8%. The areas were randomised to eight intervention and eight control clusters. The intervention included two rounds of MDA with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and single low-dose primaquine 4 weeks apart in May-June 2016. Primary and secondary outcomes were cumulative confirmed malaria case incidences 6 months post-MDA and parasite prevalences determined by PCR 3 months post-MDA. Additional outcomes included intervention coverage, treatment adherence, occurrence of adverse events, and cumulative incidences 3, 12, and 16 months post-MDA. RESULTS: Intervention coverage was 91.0% (9959/10944) and 87.7% (9355/10666) in the first and second rounds, respectively; self-reported adherence was 82.0% (881/1136) and 93.7% (985/1196). Adverse events were reported in 11.6% (147/1268) and 3.2% (37/1143) of post-MDA survey respondents after both rounds respectively. No serious adverse event was reported. No difference in cumulative malaria case incidence was observed between the control and intervention arms 6 months post-MDA (4.2 and 3.9 per 1000 population; p = 0.94). Neither was there a difference in PCR-determined parasite prevalences 3 months post-MDA (1.4% and 1.7%; OR = 1.0, p = 0.94), although having received at least the first MDA was associated with reduced odds of malaria infection (aOR = 0.35; p = 0.02). Among confirmed malaria cases at health facilities, 26.0% and 26.3% reported recent travel outside Zanzibar in the intervention and control shehias (aOR ≥ 85; p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: MDA was implemented with high coverage, adherence, and tolerability. Despite this, no significant impact on transmission was observed. The findings suggest that two rounds of MDA in a single year may not be sufficient for a sustained impact on transmission in a pre-elimination setting, especially when the MDA impact is restricted by imported malaria. Importantly, this study adds to the limited evidence for the use of MDA in low transmission settings in sub-Saharan Africa. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02721186 (registration date: March 29, 2016).
30
Weltgesundheitsorganisation · 2005 · 3.8K citations
Malaria eradication on islands
Akira Kaneko, George Taleo, Morris Kalkoa et al. · The Lancet · 2000 · 230 citations
Jordi Landier, Daniel M. Parker, Aung Myint Thu et al. · The Lancet · 2018 · 221 citations · Full text
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +15
Edwin Kamau, LaDonna S. Tolbert, Luke Kortepeter et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2011 · 202 citations · Full text