European Journal of Cancer · 2018 · 33 citations · 11 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyChemotherapyOncology PharmacotherapyCancer Survival AnalysisMetastatic Cancer ManagementMetastatic Disease ManagementMetastatic Disease TreatmentPancreatic CancerGemcitabine-based TherapyMetastatic Pancreatic CancerOverall Survival After RecurrencePancreatic Cancer PharmacotherapyRecurrence-free SurvivalRecurrent Disease TherapyRecurrent Metastatic Disease
BACKGROUND: In our previous randomised phase 2 study for patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer, S-1 plus leucovorin improved progression-free survival compared with S-1 alone. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of TAS-118 (S-1 plus leucovorin) versus S-1 in overall survival (OS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomised, open-label, phase 3 study was conducted at 58 centres in Japan and Korea. Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer that progressed during first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy or recurred during or after post-operative gemcitabine-based adjuvant treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either S-1 (40-60 mg, twice daily for 4 weeks in a 6-week cycle) or TAS-118 (S-1 40-60 mg plus leucovorin 25 mg, twice daily for 1 week in a 2-week cycle). The primary end-point was OS. RESULTS: A total of 603 patients were randomised, and 300 and 301 patients received TAS-118 and S-1, respectively. There was no difference in OS between groups (median OS for TAS-118 versus S-1, 7.6 months versus 7.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.82-1.16]; P = 0.756). Progression-free survival was significantly longer with TAS-118 than S-1 (median, 3.9 months versus 2.8 months; HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]; P = 0.009). There were interactions between Japan and Korea (P = 0.004) and between unresectable and recurrent disease (P = 0.025) in OS. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. Further studies are needed to find patients who have benefit from adding leucovorin to S-1.
11
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Thierry Conroy, Françoise Desseigne, Marc Ychou et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 7.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13
Increased Survival in Pancreatic Cancer with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine
Daniel D. Von Hoff, Thomas J. Ervin, Francis P. Arena et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 6.7K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13
Howard A. Burris, Malcolm J. Moore, John Sahl Andersen et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1997 · 5.9K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +16
Andrea Wang‐Gillam, Chung‐Pin Li, G. Bodoky et al. · The Lancet · 2015 · 1.2K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +16
Hideki Ueno, Tatsuya Ioka, Masafumi Ikeda et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2013 · 633 citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +13