ACS Nano · 2018 · 57 citations · 105 references
Natural SciencesMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceElectrochemistryMaterials ChemistryNanomaterialsAnode MaterialsBattery Cell ChemistryBattery MaterialsCarbon NanomaterialsElectrode MaterialsGraphene NanomaterialsCarbon For Sodium-ion BatteriesGrapheneGraphene DefectsGraphene MaterialsGraphene-based AnodesGraphene-based MaterialsSodium-ion Battery AnodesTunable Materials
We report a directional flow-aided sonochemistry exfoliation technique that allows for unparalleled control of graphene structural order and chemical uniformity. Depending on the orientation of the shockwave relative to the flow-aligned graphite flakes, the resultant bilayer and trilayer graphene is nearly defect free (at-edge sonication graphene “AES-G”) or is highly defective (in-plane sonication graphene “IPS-G”). AES-G has a Raman G/D band intensity ratio of 14.3 and an XPS-derived O content of 1.3 at. %, while IPS-G has an IG/D of 1.6 and 6.2 at. % O. AES-G and IPS-G are then employed to understand the role of carbon support structure and chemistry in Na metal plating/stripping for sodium metal battery anodes. The presence of graphene defects and oxygen groups is highly deleterious: In a standard carbonate solution (1 M NaClO4, 1:1 EC–DEC, 5 vol % FEC), AES-G gives stable cycling at 2 mA/cm2 with 100% Coulombic efficiency (CE) (within instrument accuracy) and an area capacity of 1 mAh/cm2. Meanwhile IPS-G performs on-par with the baseline Cu support in terms of poor CE, severe mossy metal dendrites, and periodic electrical shorts. We argue that solid electrolyte interface (SEI) stability is the key for stable cycling, with defects of IPS-G being catalytic toward SEI formation. For IPS-G, the SEI layer also shows F-rich “hot spots” due to accelerated decomposition of FEC additive in localized regions.
105
Raman Spectrum of Graphene and Graphene Layers
Andrea C. Ferrari, Jannik C. Meyer, Vittorio Scardaci et al. · Physical Review Letters · 2006 · 14.9K citations · Full text