Treatment Options for Reclaiming Wastewater Produced by the Pesticide Industry

Abstract

The pesticide production industry generates a high strength wastewater containing a range of toxic pollutants (2,4-dichlorphenoxy acetic
\nacid: 2,4-D; 4-(2,4-dichlorphenox) propionic acid: 2,4-DP; 4-(2,4-dichlorophenox) butyric acid: 2,4-DB; 2,4-dichlorophenol: 2,4-DCP;
\n2,4,6-trichlorophenol: 2,4,6-TCP; 4-chlororthocresol: PCOC; 4-chloro-2-methyl phenoxyacetic acid: MCPA, 4-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) butyric
\nacid: MCPB and 2-(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy) propionic acid: MCPP). These pesticides can enter the natural environment and water sources if
\nnot removed in a wastewater treatment plant. Treated effluents are regulated by legislation such as the Water Framework Directive (WFD). Most
\nstudies found in literature focused on synthetic solutions, synthetic wastewater, at lab-scale or pilot-scale. Although these studies can provide
\ninformation on the removal mechanisms and provide a comparison between process efficiency, they have limited practical applicability. The
\nprocess that has been more widely used to treat high strength wastewaters rich in recalcitrant compounds at full-scale, is the combination of
\nbiological/granular activated carbon and granular activated carbon/biological processes. The pesticide production wastewater contains a variety
\nof compounds, that can be removed by 80-90% using biological processes (such as membrane bioreactors) and granular activated carbon has
\nbeen shown to selectively remove the pesticides, potentially creating a high quality effluent. Nevertheless, in order to assert processes design,
\nefficiencies or costs, it is crucial to evaluate these processes experimentally.