JAMA Oncology · 2018 · 310 citations · 25 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyChemotherapyImmunotherapyOncology PharmacotherapyCancer ImmunotherapyCheckpoint Inhibitor TherapyCombination ImmunotherapyImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapy SafetyTargeted TherapyCytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated Protein 4 InhibitorsDual Checkpoint InhibitionDual Immune Checkpoint InhibitionDurvalumab TherapyOpen-label TrialsPd-l1 BlockadeProgrammed Death-ligand 1 InhibitionProgrammed Death-ligand 1 Inhibitors
Importance: Dual blockade of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) may overcome immune checkpoint inhibition. It is unknown whether dual blockade can potentiate antitumor activity without compromising safety in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) and low or no PD-L1 tumor cell expression. Objective: To assess safety and objective response rate of durvalumab combined with tremelimumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: The CONDOR study was a phase 2, randomized, open-label study of Durvalumab, Tremelimumab, and Durvalumab in Combination With Tremelimumab in Patients With R/M HNSCC. Eligibility criteria included PD-L1-low/negative disease that had progressed after 1 platinum-containing regimen in the R/M setting. Patients were randomized (N = 267) from April 15, 2015, to March 16, 2016, at 127 sites in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Interventions: Durvalumab (20 mg/kg every 4 weeks) + tremelimumab (1 mg/kg every 4 weeks) for 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks), or durvalumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks) monotherapy, or tremelimumab (10 mg/kg every 4 weeks for 7 doses then every 12 weeks for 2 doses) monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety and tolerability and efficacy measured by objective response rate. Results: Among the 267 patients (220 men [82.4%]), median age (range) of patients was 61.0 (23-82) years. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 patients (15.8%) treated with durvalumab + tremelimumab, 8 (12.3%) treated with durvalumab, and 11 (16.9%) treated with tremelimumab. Grade 3/4 immune-mediated adverse events occurred in 8 patients (6.0%) in the combination arm only. Objective response rate (95% CI) was 7.8% (3.78%-13.79%) in the combination arm (n = 129), 9.2% (3.46%-19.02%) for durvalumab monotherapy (n = 65), and 1.6% (0.04%-8.53%) for tremelimumab monotherapy (n = 63); median overall survival (95% CI) for all patients treated was 7.6 (4.9-10.6), 6.0 (4.0-11.3), and 5.5 (3.9-7.0) months, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with R/M HNSCC and low or no PD-L1 tumor cell expression, all 3 regimens exhibited a manageable toxicity profile. Durvalumab and durvalumab + tremelimumab resulted in clinical benefit, with minimal observed difference between the two. A phase 3 study is under way. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02319044.
25
Safety, Activity, and Immune Correlates of Anti–PD-1 Antibody in Cancer
Suzanne L. Topalian, F. Stephen Hodi, Julie R. Brahmer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 12.7K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Immunology, Oncology +17
Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma
James Larkin, Vanna Chiarion‐Sileni, René González et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 8.1K citations · Full text
Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients
Roy S. Herbst, Jean‐Charles Soria, Marcin Kowanetz et al. · Nature · 2014 · 5.3K citations
Medicine, Immunology, Oncology +16
Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Robert L. Ferris, George R. Blumenschein, Jérôme Fayette et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2016 · 5.1K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Metastasis +5
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
Jedd D. Wolchok, Harriet M. Kluger, Margaret K. Callahan et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 4.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17