Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages · 2018 · 340 citations · 22 references
EngineeringInformation SecuritySoftware EngineeringSource Code AnalysisEthereum Smart ContractsCryptocurrencySoftware AnalysisFormal VerificationHardware SecuritySmart Contract LanguageManagementEthereum BlockchainSystems EngineeringGas-focused VulnerabilitiesRuntime VerificationComputer ScienceStatic Program AnalysisSmart ContractLanguage-based SecurityData SecurityGas LimitSoftware SecurityProgram AnalysisSoftware TestingFinancial EngineeringBlockchainSystem Software
Ethereum is a distributed blockchain platform, serving as an ecosystem for smart contracts: full-fledged inter-communicating programs that capture the transaction logic of an account. Unlike programs in mainstream languages, a gas limit restricts the execution of an Ethereum smart contract: execution proceeds as long as gas is available. Thus, gas is a valuable resource that can be manipulated by an attacker to provoke unwanted behavior in a victim's smart contract (e.g., wasting or blocking funds of said victim). Gas-focused vulnerabilities exploit undesired behavior when a contract (directly or through other interacting contracts) runs out of gas. Such vulnerabilities are among the hardest for programmers to protect against, as out-of-gas behavior may be uncommon in non-attack scenarios and reasoning about it is far from trivial. In this paper, we classify and identify gas-focused vulnerabilities, and present MadMax: a static program analysis technique to automatically detect gas-focused vulnerabilities with very high confidence. Our approach combines a control-flow-analysis-based decompiler and declarative program-structure queries. The combined analysis captures high-level domain-specific concepts (such as "dynamic data structure storage" and "safely resumable loops") and achieves high precision and scalability. MadMax analyzes the entirety of smart contracts in the Ethereum blockchain in just 10 hours (with decompilation timeouts in 8% of the cases) and flags contracts with a (highly volatile) monetary value of over $2.8B as vulnerable. Manual inspection of a sample of flagged contracts shows that 81% of the sampled warnings do indeed lead to vulnerabilities, which we report on in our experiment.
22
Ethereum: A Secure Decentralised Generalised Transaction Ledger
Gavin Wood · 2013 · 5.3K citations
Making Smart Contracts Smarter
Loi Luu, Duc-Hiep Chu, Hrishi Olickel et al. · 2016 · 2.2K citations
Marco Iansiti, Karim R. Lakhani · 2017 · 1.5K citations
Extended static checking for Java
Cormac Flanagan, K. Rustan M. Leino, Mark Lillibridge et al. · 2002 · 1.3K citations
Raja Vallée-Rai, Phong Co, Étienne Gagnon et al. · 2010 · 921 citations