Publication | Closed Access
Predictive Current Control vs. PI Control for Surface Mounted Permanent Magnet Machines
10
Citations
19
References
2018
Year
Unknown Venue
Electrical EngineeringPredictive Current ControlEngineeringStandard Pi ControllerElectric MachineMotor DriveMechatronicsMechanical SystemsElectrical DrivePower Electronics ConverterSystems EngineeringPid ControlDynamic PerformanceModel Predictive ControlPower System ControlPower ElectronicsPi ControlComparative Study
This article presents a comparative study of a standard PI controller with three more advanced predictive current control schemes, applied to a surface mounted permanent magnet synchronous machine fed by a two-level voltage source inverter. The three predictive current controllers are: finite-set model based predictive control, deadbeat control, and a combination of both previous algorithms. Key performance indicators concerning control- and voltage quality, dynamic performance and parameter sensitivity, enable a quantitative comparison of the four controllers. The indicators are not only obtained from simulation results, they are also experimentally validated on a 4 kW axial flux permanent magnet synchronous machine with yokeless and segmented armature topology. A general conclusion is that the PI controller excels when it comes to control quality: only the deadbeat controller can compete with its low torque ripple. The predictive controllers on the other hand show superior dynamic performance.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1