European Journal of Ophthalmology · 2018 · 35 citations · 20 references
Health ProfessionsOphthalmologyVision ScienceBiomedical OpticsOcular ImagingOphthalmic SurgeryGlaucomaOptical Coherence TomographyRetinal AnatomyRetinal ExaminationRetinal ImagingRetinal Vascular DiseaseDiagnostic Accuracy StudiesDiagnostic Testing AccuracyOcular Vascular AssessmentOptical Coherence Tomography AngiographyOptical Coherence Tomography InstrumentationPrimary Angle-closure GlaucomaRetinal Nerve Fiber Layer AnalysisRetinal Vessel Analysis
PURPOSE: To compare peripapillary vascular parameters derived from two optical coherence tomography angiography devices in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, primary open-angle glaucoma, and healthy controls and to evaluate their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional study. In total, 20 eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, 20 primary open-angle glaucoma eyes matched by peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, and 20 control eyes were recruited. Participants underwent standard automated perimetry and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer analysis by Optovue and Cirrus optical coherence tomography. Vascular parameters provided by Angiovue and Angioplex optical coherence tomography angiography were compared. Their diagnostic accuracy and correlation with structural and functional parameters were assessed. RESULTS: All peripapillary optical coherence tomography angiography vascular parameters were significantly different among groups (all p < 0.05). The whole image capillary density and peripapillary capillary density by Angiovue were significantly lower in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma compared with primary open-angle glaucoma (p = 0.009 and p = 0.001, respectively). Conversely, vascular parameters by Angioplex were not statistically different between primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. A good correlation was found using Angiovue between whole image capillary density and visual field mean deviation (0.758, p < 0.001), peripapillary capillary density and visual field mean deviation (0.729, p = 0.001), and peripapillary capillary density and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in eyes with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (0.716, p = 0.001). Angiovue parameters showed higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curves than Angioplex to discriminate among groups. CONCLUSION: Only Angiovue detected a significantly lower capillary density in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma compared to primary open-angle glaucoma at similar glaucoma damage. Both, Angiovue and Angioplex demonstrated a decreased capillary density in glaucoma eyes compared to healthy eyes. Furthermore, Angiovue-derived vascular parameters showed better correlation with functional and structural parameters and a higher diagnostic capacity to discriminate among groups compared to Angioplex.
20
Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of the Peripapillary Retina in Glaucoma
Liang Liu, Yali Jia, Hana L. Takusagawa et al. · JAMA Ophthalmology · 2015 · 658 citations · Full text
Adeleh Yarmohammadi, Linda M. Zangwill, Alberto Diniz‐Filho et al. · Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science · 2016 · 503 citations · Full text
Xiaolei Wang, Chunhui Jiang, Tony H. Ko et al. · Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · 2015 · 357 citations
Zaid Mammo, Morgan Heisler, Chandrakumar Balaratnasingam et al. · American Journal of Ophthalmology · 2016 · 186 citations · Full text