World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2018 · 20 citations · 14 references
MedicineSurgeryBowel ManagementGeneral SurgeryInterventional RadiologyEndoscopic SurgeryGastrointestinal EndoscopyStent PlacementTherapeutic EndoscopyControl Group DesignEndoscopic StentingEsophageal DilationIntestinal StentingIntestinal StricturesMatched Control GroupStricture Dilation
AIM: To evaluate the clinical and economical efficacy of lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) in the treatment of benign foregut strictures. METHODS: -tests and five-parameter regression analysis. RESULTS: Nine hundred and ninety-eight foregut endoscopic dilations were performed between January 2014 and May 2017. 15 patients underwent endoscopic LAMS placement for treatment of benign foregut stricture. Thirty-six patients with recurrent benign foregut strictures underwent three or more endoscopic dilations without stent placement. The cost ratio of endoscopic dilation to LAMS (stent, placement and retrieval) is 5.77. Cost effective analysis demonstrated LAMS to be economical after three endoscopic dilation overall. LAMS was cost effective after two dilations in the Post-surgical stricture subgroup. CONCLUSION: Endoscopists should consider LAMS for the treatment of benign foregut strictures if symptoms persist past three endoscopic dilations. Post-surgical strictures may benefit from LAMS if symptoms persist after two dilations in a post-surgical. Early intervention with LAMS appears to be a clinically and economically viable option for durable symptomatic relief in patients with these strictures.
14
Erik von Elm, Douglas G. Altman, Matthias Egger et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2007 · 21.6K citations · Full text
Public Health, Public Health Practice, Epidemiologic Methods +10
Michael Drummond, Andrea Manca, Mark Sculpher · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · 2005 · 257 citations