Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses

Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions

Annals of Internal Medicine · 1997 · 2.2K citations

Nursing, Health Policy, Evidence-based Practice +16

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

Beverley Shea, Candyce Hamel, George A. Wells et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2009 · 1.8K citations · Full text

Education, Educational Assessment, Method Validation +13

The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses

John P. A. Ioannidis · Milbank Quarterly · 2016 · 1.5K citations · Full text

Nursing, Biostatistics, Evidence-based Practice +11

Single data extraction generated more errors than double data extraction in systematic reviews

Nina Buscemi, Lisa Hartling, Ben Vandermeer et al. · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2006 · 463 citations

Public Health, Information Systems, Meta-analysis +14

Compliance with Results Reporting at ClinicalTrials.gov

Monique Anderson, Karen Chiswell, Eric D. Peterson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 382 citations · Full text

Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Policy, Clinical Trial Regulation +15