The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · 2018 · 40 citations · 28 references
In recent years, the ‘mechanistic view’ (MV) has developed as a popular alternative to the ‘semantic view’ concerning the identity of physical computation. However, semanticists have provided powerful arguments that suggest the MV fails to deliver essential distinctions between paradigmatic computational operations. This article reviews responses on behalf of the mechanist and uses this opportunity to propose a type of pluralism about computational identity. This pluralism contends that there are multiple ‘levels’ of properties and relations pertaining to computation that can inform different kinds of individuation. As such, for the pluralist, there are multiple legitimate ways of classifying computation, depending on the nature of the system in question, and one’s own epistemic priorities.
28
Knowledge and the Flow of Information.
William P. Alston, Fred Dretske · The Philosophical Review · 1983 · 3.3K citations
Perception, Communication, Semantics +16
Peter Machamer, Lindley Darden, Carl F. Craver · Philosophy of Science · 2000 · 3.1K citations
Daniel C. Dennett · The Journal of Philosophy · 1991 · 898 citations