EBioMedicine · 2018 · 38 citations · 31 references
MedicineHematologySurgeryCell TherapyImmunotherapyVascular SurgeryAmputationCritical Limb IschemiaThrombosisCritical Limb Ischemia InterventionCritical Limb Ischemia TreatmentLimb Ischemia ManagementLimb Salvage CareLower Limb IschemiaPrimary Efficacy Endpoints
BACKGROUND: cells (PCCs) are increasingly being used at treating no-option critical limb ischaemia (NO-CLI). We aimed to compare the efficacies and uncover the advantages associated with each treatment approach. METHODS: A randomised single-blinded non-inferiority trial (Number: NCT 02089828) was performed. NO-CLI patients were 1:1 randomised to the PBMNCs and PCCs groups, and compared in relation to safety and efficacy outcomes. The primary efficacy outcomes included major amputation and total amputation over 12 months. The major amputation-free survival (MAFS) and total amputation-free survival (TAFS) rates were calculated. FINDINGS: Fifty patients (25 per group, 47 with thromboangiitis obliterans and 3 with other angiitis) were enrolled, with a median follow-up period of 24.5 months (interquartile range: 17-34 months). One patient in the PCCs group was lost at 2 months and one major amputation occurred in the PBMNCs group at 3 months post-transplantation. The total amputation rates at 6 months post-transplantation were 28.0% in the PCCs group and 16.0% in the PBMNCs group (p = 0.343), and remained unchanged at 12 months. The groups did not differ regarding the MAFS and TAFS (Breslow-Wilcoxon test: p = 0.3014 and p = 0.3414). The PCCs group had a significantly higher probability of rest pain relief than the PBMNCs group (Breslow-Wilcoxon test: p = 0.0454). INTERPRETATION: PCCs was not inferior to PBMNCs at limb salvage in the treatment of angiitis-induced NO-CLI and appeared to induce earlier ischaemia relief. Each cell type had specific advantages. These outcomes require verification from longer-term trials involving larger numbers of patients. FUND: Training program for outstanding academic leaders of Shanghai health and family planning system (Hundred Talent Program,Grant No. 2018BR40); China National Natural Science Funds (Grant No. 30801122); The excellent core member training programme at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, China (Grant No. 2015ZSYXGG02); and Zhongshan Funds for the Institute of Vascular Surgery, Fudan University, China. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 02089828).
31
Isolation of Putative Progenitor Endothelial Cells for Angiogenesis
Takayuki Asahara, Toyoaki Murohara, Alison Sullivan et al. · Science · 1997 · 8.7K citations
Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II)
Lars Norgren, William R. Hiatt, John Dormandy et al. · Journal of Vascular Surgery · 2007 · 8.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +15