npj Breast Cancer · 2018 · 333 citations · 35 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyBreast OncologyMolecular OncologyTumor PathologyCancer DetectionCancer DiagnosisMolecular Classification Of TumorsTumor CharacterizationTumor ClassificationTumor DetectionBreast Cancer HistologyBreast Cancer Molecular SubtypesBreast Tumor ClassificationHistologic GradeMolecular Detection AssaysMolecular Subtype PredictionTumor Grade AssessmentTumor Grade Classification
Abstract RNA-based, multi-gene molecular assays are available and widely used for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative breast cancers. However, RNA-based genomic tests can be costly and are not available in many countries. Methods for inferring molecular subtype from histologic images may identify patients most likely to benefit from further genomic testing. To identify patients who could benefit from molecular testing based on H&E stained histologic images, we developed an image analysis approach using deep learning. A training set of 571 breast tumors was used to create image-based classifiers for tumor grade, ER status, PAM50 intrinsic subtype, histologic subtype, and risk of recurrence score (ROR-PT). The resulting classifiers were applied to an independent test set ( n = 288), and accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of each was assessed on the test set. Histologic image analysis with deep learning distinguished low-intermediate vs. high tumor grade (82% accuracy), ER status (84% accuracy), Basal-like vs. non-Basal-like (77% accuracy), Ductal vs. Lobular (94% accuracy), and high vs. low-medium ROR-PT score (75% accuracy). Sampling considerations in the training set minimized bias in the test set. Incorrect classification of ER status was significantly more common for Luminal B tumors. These data provide proof of principle that molecular marker status, including a critical clinical biomarker (i.e., ER status), can be predicted with accuracy >75% based on H&E features. Image-based methods could be promising for identifying patients with a greater need for further genomic testing, or in place of classically scored variables typically accomplished using human-based scoring.
35
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Krzysztof J. Cios, Mark E. Shields · Neurocomputing · 1997 · 22.3K citations
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 28
Peter Flach, Meelis Kull · 2015 · 14.7K citations
LIBLINEAR: A Library for Large Linear Classification
Rong-En Fan, Kai‐Wei Chang, Cho‐Jui Hsieh et al. · 2008 · 6.6K citations
Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes
Joel S. Parker, Michael E. Mullins, Maggie C.U. Cheang et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 4.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Bioinformatics, Oncology +16
CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition
Ali Sharif Razavian, Hossein Azizpour, Josephine Sullivan et al. · 2014 · 4.3K citations · Full text