2018 · 71 citations · 27 references
ComputingData ScienceHealth InformaticsData MiningHealth Data AnalyticsMachine LearningDecision TreesEnsemble MethodsFraud DetectionFraud PreventionHealth Care FraudHealthcare FraudClass ImbalanceCross-validationFraud Detection Evaluation MetricsFraud Detection Performance EvaluationHealth Care Fraud DetectionImbalanced ClassificationProvider Fraud DetectionRandom Forest Classification
The healthcare industry generates a substantial amount of data. This big data includes information such as patient records and provider payments. The use of big data is often considered the best way to produce effective models in areas such as fraud detection. In this study, we demonstrate that the use of more highly imbalanced big data does not produce acceptable fraud detection results. We use random undersampling to generate seven different class distributions and compare performance results. We use the 2012- 2015 Calendar Year Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data mapping actual fraud labels from the List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE). Our results, based on building Random Forest models using 5-fold cross-validation, demonstrate that 90:10 is the best class distribution with an 0.87302 AUC, whereas the balanced and two highly imbalanced distributions produced the worst fraud detection performance. Furthermore, we show that the commonly used ratio of 50:50 (balanced) was not significantly better than using a 99:1 (imbalanced) class distribution. Our study clearly demonstrates the need to apply at least some sampling to big data with class imbalance and suggests the 50:50 class distribution does not produce the best Medicare fraud detection results.
27
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Comparing Individual Means in the Analysis of Variance
John W. Tukey · Biometrics · 1949 · 4.1K citations
The Parable of Google Flu: Traps in Big Data Analysis
David Lazer, Ryan Kennedy, Gary King et al. · Science · 2014 · 2.5K citations · Full text