Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2018 · 60 citations · 19 references
MedicineDermatologyOphthalmologyBiomedical OpticsOphthalmic SurgeryPhotodermatologyActinic KeratosisOphthalmic GelsPhotodynamic TherapyTopical PreparationsActinic Keratosis TreatmentDermatologic Photodynamic TherapyLesion ClearanceNanoemulsion SystemsOphthalmic Photodynamic TherapyPrimary Efficacy EndpointsTreatment Modality SelectionTreatment Parameters
BACKGROUND: The most effective treatment modality for actinic keratosis (AK) is photodynamic therapy (PDT). Major obstacles of PDT are the need of a special illumination device and pain accompanying the illumination. These issues may be overcome by replacing an artificial high-power light source with natural daylight for more extended illumination at lower light doses. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether BF-200 ALA (a nanoemulsion gel containing 7.8% 5-aminolaevulinic acid) is non-inferior to MAL (a cream containing 16% methyl-aminolaevulinate) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate AK with daylight PDT (dPDT). Non-inferiority of the primary efficacy variable (total lesion clearance rate per patient's side 12 weeks after PDT) is established if the mean response for BF-200 ALA is no worse than for MAL, within a statistical margin of Δ = -12.5%. METHODS: The study was performed as an intraindividual comparison with 52 patients in seven centres in Germany and Spain. Each patient received one dPDT. Results include clinical endpoints as well as 1-year follow-up results. RESULTS: Twelve weeks after a single dPDT, 79.8% of the AK lesions treated with BF-200 ALA gel and 76.5% of the lesions treated with MAL cream were completely cleared. The median of differences was 0.0 with a one-sided 97.5% CI of 0.0, establishing non-inferiority (P < 0.0001). Results for secondary efficacy parameters were in line with the primary outcome. Recurrence rates 1 year after the treatment were 19.9% for lesions treated with BF-200 ALA and 31.6% for lesions treated with MAL. Adverse reactions including pain were mostly mild and transient and identical to those previously described for dPDT. CONCLUSION: Daylight PDT of AK with BF-200 ALA is well-tolerated and non-inferior to MAL/dPDT. The study demonstrates a trend towards higher efficacies after 3 months and significantly lower recurrence rates after 1 year follow-up.
19
Elise A. Olsen, M. Lisa Abernethy, Carol L. Kulp‐Shorten et al. · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 1991 · 393 citations
Stine Regin Wiegell, Merete Hædersdal, Peter A. Philipsen et al. · British Journal of Dermatology · 2008 · 345 citations
Medicine, Dermatology, Ophthalmology +14
Diana Rubel, Lynda Spelman, Dédée F. Murrell et al. · British Journal of Dermatology · 2014 · 222 citations
Medicine, Dermatology, Ophthalmology +13
Thomas Dirschka, Peter Radny, R. Dominicus et al. · British Journal of Dermatology · 2011 · 181 citations
Medicine, Dermatology, Pharmacology +15