Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2018 · 90 citations · 23 references
PharmacyOncologyPreventive MedicineCost-effectiveness AnalysisCost-utility AnalysisPharmacoeconomic ModelingCost-effectiveness ModelingEconomic EvaluationHealthcare Cost AnalysisIncremental Cost-effectiveness AnalysisModel-based Economic EvaluationWillingness-to-pay ThresholdsAge-specific Cancer IncidenceCost-effectivenessHealth Economics Of ScreeningIncremental Cost EstimationMarkov Cost-effectiveness ModelsProbabilistic Sensitivity AnalysisQuality-adjusted Life Year ModelingTransition Probability Models
OBJECTIVE: To model the cost-effectiveness of a risk-based breast cancer screening programme in urban China, launched in 2012, compared with no screening. METHODS: We developed a Markov model to estimate the lifetime costs and effects, in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), of a breast cancer screening programme for high-risk women aged 40-69 years. We derived or adopted age-specific incidence and transition probability data, assuming a natural history progression between the stages of cancer, from other studies. We obtained lifetime direct and indirect treatment costs in 2014 United States dollars (US$) from surveys of breast cancer patients in 37 Chinese hospitals. To calculate QALYs, we derived utility scores from cross-sectional patient surveys. We evaluated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for various scenarios for comparison with a willingness-to-pay threshold. FINDINGS: Our baseline model of annual screening yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$ 8253/QALY, lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold of US$ 23 050/QALY. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results are robust. In the exploration of various scenarios, screening every 3 years is the most cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$ 6671/QALY. The cost-effectiveness of the screening is reduced if not all diagnosed women seek treatment. Finally, the economic benefit of screening women aged 45-69 years with both ultrasound and mammography, compared with mammography alone, is uncertain. CONCLUSION: High-risk population-based breast cancer screening is cost-effective compared with no screening.
23
Breast-Cancer Screening — Viewpoint of the IARC Working Group
Béatrice Secretan, Chiara Scoccianti, Dana Loomis et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2015 · 961 citations · Full text
Cost–effectiveness thresholds: pros and cons
Melanie Bertram, Jeremy A. Lauer, Kees de Joncheere et al. · Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2016 · 788 citations · Full text
Pharmacy, Economics, Health Policy +17
American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003
R. A. Smith, Debbie Saslow, Kim Sawyer et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2003 · 781 citations · Full text