eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes) · 2018 · 18 citations · 17 references
ComputingBiomedical InformaticsHealth InformaticsClinical Decision SupportClinical InformaticsClinical Information SystemsClinical DocumentationClinical GenomicsClinical Reporting SystemsResults ManagementAccess To Genetic Test ResultsGenomic Decision SupportGenomic Reporting SystemsLaboratory Results ReportingPatient Decision SupportSecure Data ExchangeSecure Information ExchangeSemi-structured Interviews
CONTEXT: Communication of genetic laboratory results to patients and providers is impeded by the complexity of results and reports. This can lead to misinterpretation of results, causing inappropriate care. Patients often do not receive a copy of the report leading to possible miscommunication. To address these problems, we conducted patient-centered research to inform design of interpretive reports. Here we describe the development and deployment of a specific patient-centered clinical decision support (CDS) tool, a multi-use patient-centered genomic test report (PGR) that interfaces with an electronic health record (EHR). IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS: A PGR with a companion provider report was configured for implementation within the EHR using locally developed software (COMPASS™) to manage secure data exchange and access. FINDINGS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients, family members, and clinicians that showed they sought clear information addressing findings, family implications, resources, prognosis and next steps relative to the genomic result. Providers requested access to applicable, available clinical guidelines. Initial results indicated patients and providers found the PGR contained helpful, valuable information and would provide a basis for result-related conversation between patients, providers and family. MAJOR THEMES: Direct patient involvement in the design and development of a PGR identified format and presentation preferences, and delivery of relevant information to patients and providers, prompting the creation of a CDS tool. CONCLUSIONS: Research and development of patient-centered CDS tools designed to support improved patient outcomes, are enhanced by early and substantial engagement of patients in contributing to all phases of tool design and development.
17
Sarah S. Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J. Bale et al. · Genetics in Medicine · 2016 · 1.7K citations · Full text
Validation of a Decision Regret Scale
Annette M. O’Connor, Timothy J. Wood, Thomas F. Hack et al. · Medical Decision Making · 2003 · 1.4K citations