Publication | Open Access
Updated bounds on sum of neutrino masses in various cosmological scenarios
121
Citations
90
References
2018
Year
We present strong bounds on the sum of three active neutrino masses ($\\sum\nm_{\\nu}$) in various cosmological models. We use the following baseline\ndatasets: CMB temperature data from Planck 2015, BAO measurements from SDSS-III\nBOSS DR12, the newly released SNe Ia dataset from Pantheon Sample, and a prior\non the optical depth to reionization from 2016 Planck Intermediate results. We\nconstrain cosmological parameters in $\\Lambda CDM$ model with 3 massive active\nneutrinos. For this $\\Lambda CDM+\\sum m_{\\nu}$ model we find a upper bound of\n$\\sum m_{\\nu} <$ 0.152 eV at 95$\\%$ C.L. Adding the high-$l$ polarization data\nfrom Planck strengthens this bound to $\\sum m_{\\nu} <$ 0.118 eV, which is very\nclose to the minimum required mass of $\\sum m_{\\nu} \\simeq$ 0.1 eV for inverted\nhierarchy. This bound is reduced to $\\sum m_{\\nu} <$ 0.110 eV when we also vary\nr, the tensor to scalar ratio ($\\Lambda CDM+r+\\sum m_{\\nu}$ model), and add an\nadditional dataset, BK14, the latest data released from the Bicep-Keck\ncollaboration. This bound is further reduced to $\\sum m_{\\nu} <$ 0.101 eV in a\ncosmology with non-phantom dynamical dark energy ($w_0 w_a CDM+\\sum m_{\\nu}$\nmodel with $w(z)\\geq -1$ for all $z$). Considering the $w_0 w_a CDM+r+\\sum\nm_{\\nu}$ model and adding the BK14 data again, the bound can be even further\nreduced to $\\sum m_{\\nu} <$ 0.093 eV. For the $w_0 w_a CDM+\\sum m_{\\nu}$ model\nwithout any constraint on $w(z)$, the bounds however relax to $\\sum m_{\\nu} <$\n0.276 eV. Adding a prior on the Hubble constant ($H_0 = 73.24\\pm 1.74$\nkm/sec/Mpc) from Hubble Space Telescope (HST), the above mentioned bounds\nfurther improve to $\\sum m_{\\nu} <$ 0.117 eV, 0.091 eV, 0.085 eV, 0.082 eV,\n0.078 eV and 0.247 eV respectively. This substantial improvement is mostly\ndriven by a more than 3$\\sigma$ tension between Planck 2015 and HST\nmeasurements of $H_0$ and should be taken cautiously. (abstract abridged)\n
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1