Publication | Closed Access
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Advanced Wastewater Treatment Processes for Removal of Chemicals of Emerging Concern
83
Citations
72
References
2018
Year
EngineeringEnvironmental Impact AssessmentMunicipal WastewaterWater Quality ManagementPotential Health EffectsWastewater TreatmentWater TreatmentDrinking Water TreatmentWater QualityEcotoxicologyWastewater ManagementIndustrial WastewaterWaste ManagementCec RemovalEffluent DisposalEnvironmental EngineeringEnvironmental RemediationLife Cycle AssessmentEnvironmental ToxicologyLife CycleEmerging Concern
The potential health effects associated with contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) have motivated regulatory initiatives and deployment of energy- and chemical-intensive advanced treatment processes for their removal. This study evaluates life cycle environmental and health impacts associated with advanced CEC removal processes, encompassing both the benefits of improved effluent quality as well as emissions from upstream activities. A total of 64 treatment configurations were designed and modeled for treating typical U.S. medium-strength wastewater, covering three policy-relevant representative levels of carbon and nutrient removal, with and without additional tertiary CEC removal. The USEtox model was used to calculate characterization factors of several CECs with missing values. Stochastic uncertainty analysis considered variability in influent water quality and uncertainty in CEC toxicity and associated characterization factors. Results show that advanced tertiary treatment can simultaneously reduce nutrients and CECs in effluents to specified limits, but these direct water quality benefits were outweighed by even greater increases in indirect impacts for the toxicity-related metrics, even when considering order-of-magnitude uncertainties for CEC characterization factors. Future work should consider water quality aspects not currently captured in life cycle impact assessment, such as endocrine disruption, in order to evaluate the full policy implications of the CEC removal.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1