Frontiers in Neurology · 2018 · 32 citations · 24 references
MedicineNeurologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyNeuroradiologyBrain ImagingNeurodegenerative DiseasesNeurodegenerative DisordersNeurologic ImagingNuclear Medicine ImagingPositron Emission TomographyClinical Diagnosis Of ParkinsonismCorticobasal SyndromeFluorine-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission TomographyHigh-risk DiagnosesNegative Predictive Value AssessmentNeuroimaging In Parkinson's DiseaseNeurologic Pet ImagingParkinson Disease Imaging
Background: F-18-fluordeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) is widely used for discriminative diagnosis of tau-positive atypical parkinsonian syndromes (T+APS). This approach now stands to be augmented with more specific tau tracers. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed a large clinical routine dataset of FDG-PET images for evaluation of the strengths and limitations of stand-alone FDG-PET. Methods: A total of 117 patients (age 68.4 ± 11.1 y) underwent an FDG-PET exam. Patients were followed clinically for a minimum of one year and their final clinical diagnosis was recorded. FDG-PET was rated visually (positive/ negative) and categorized as high, moderate or low likelihood of T+APS and other neurodegenerative disorders. We then calculated positive and negative predictive values (PPV/ NPV) of FDG-PET readings for the different subgroups relative to their final clinical diagnosis. Results: Suspected diagnoses were confirmed by clinical follow-up (≥ 1 y) for 62 out of 117 (53%) of patients. PPV was excellent when FDG-PET indicated a high likelihood of T+APS in combination with low to moderate likelihood of another neurodegenerative disorder. PPV was distinctly lower when FDG-PET indicated only a moderate likelihood of T+APS or when there was deemed equal likelihood of other neurodegenerative disorder. NPV of FDG-PET with a low likelihood for T+APS was high. Conclusions: FDG-PET has high value in clinical routine evaluation of suspected T+APS, gaining satisfactory differential diagnosis in two thirds of the patients. One third of patients would potentially profit from further evaluation by more specific radioligands, with FDG-PET serving gatekeeper function for the more expensive methods.
24
Criteria for the diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration
Melissa J. Armstrong, Irene Litvan, Anthony E. Lang et al. · Neurology · 2013 · 1.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Neurology, Neuroscience +15
Does corticobasal degeneration exist? A clinicopathological re-evaluation
Helen Ling, Sean S. O’Sullivan, JL Holton et al. · Brain · 2010 · 392 citations · Full text