Risk Analysis · 2018 · 427 citations · 48 references
PlanningRisk ManagementClimate Change AdaptationCritical Infrastructure ProtectionDisaster Risk ReductionDisaster MitigationDisaster Risk AssessmentInfrastructure ResilienceCascading Risk AssessmentDisaster AdaptationSendai Framework Implementation
Recent research has increasingly focused on interconnected, compound, interacting, and cascading risks, which are central to resilience debates and integrate climate adaptation, infrastructure protection, and societal resilience, yet overlapping definitions risk confusion and duplicated effort. The article provides an overview of the state of the art on these risks to build a coherent basis for implementing the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. It proposes a holistic framework that highlights complementarities among the four risk types to support researchers and policymakers, suggesting their use as inputs to new analyses and decision tools with minimal redundancy. The framework can improve policy recommendations and support tools for emergency and crisis management, such as scenario building and impact trees, advancing a system‑wide resilience approach.
Abstract In recent years, there has been a gradual increase in research literature on the challenges of interconnected, compound, interacting, and cascading risks. These concepts are becoming ever more central to the resilience debate. They aggregate elements of climate change adaptation, critical infrastructure protection, and societal resilience in the face of complex, high‐impact events. However, despite the potential of these concepts to link together diverse disciplines, scholars and practitioners need to avoid treating them in a superficial or ambiguous manner. Overlapping uses and definitions could generate confusion and lead to the duplication of research effort. This article gives an overview of the state of the art regarding compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks. It is intended to help build a coherent basis for the implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR). The main objective is to propose a holistic framework that highlights the complementarities of the four kinds of complex risk in a manner that is designed to support the work of researchers and policymakers. This article suggests how compound, interconnected, interacting, and cascading risks could be used, with little or no redundancy, as inputs to new analyses and decisional tools designed to support the implementation of the SFDRR. The findings can be used to improve policy recommendations and support tools for emergency and crisis management, such as scenario building and impact trees, thus contributing to the achievement of a system‐wide approach to resilience.
48
Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks
Sergey V. Buldyrev, Roni Parshani, Gerald Paul et al. · Nature · 2010 · 4.4K citations · Full text
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Dirk Helbing · Nature · 2013 · 1.3K citations