Colorectal Disease · 2018 · 17 citations · 22 references
MedicineClinical SciencesPublic Health PracticeCancer ScreeningEarly DetectionGastroenterologyColonic DiseasesColonic DisordersColorectal CancerGastrointestinal EndoscopyPopulation ScreeningScreeningColonoscopy ScreeningColorectal Cancer ScreeningComplication Rate AnalysisComplication Rate MeasurementEndoscopic ScreeningIntubation ComplicationsScreening Program QualitySmall Adenoma Detection
AIM: The delivery of the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (SBoSP) is rooted in the provision of a high quality, effective and participant-centred service. Safe and effective colonoscopy forms an integral part of the process. Additional accreditation as part of a multi-faceted programme for participating colonoscopists, as in England, does not exist in Scotland. This study aimed to describe the quality of colonoscopy in the SBoSP and compare this to the English national screening standards. METHODS: Data were collected from the SBoSP between 2007 and 2014. End-points for analysis were caecal intubation, cancer, polyp and adenoma detection, and complications. Overall results were compared with 2012 published English national standards for screening and outcomes from 2006 to 2009. RESULTS: During the study period 53 332 participants attended for colonoscopy. The colonoscopy completion rate was 95.6% overall. The mean cancer detection rate was 7.1%, the polyp detection rate was 45.7% and the adenoma detection rate was 35.5%. The overall complication rate was 0.47%. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy quality in the SBoSP has exceeded the standard set for screening colonoscopy in England, despite not adopting a multi-faceted programme for screening colonoscopy. However, the overall adenoma detection rate in Scotland was 9.1% lower than that in England which has implications for colonoscopy quality and may have an impact on cancer prevention rates, a key aim of the SBoSP.
22
Reducing Mortality from Colorectal Cancer by Screening for Fecal Occult Blood
Jack S. Mandel, John H. Bond, Timothy R. Church et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1993 · 3.3K citations · Full text
Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer
J D Hardcastle, J Chamberlain, Michael HE Robinson et al. · The Lancet · 1996 · 2.8K citations
Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death
Douglas A. Corley, Christopher D. Jensen, Amy R. Marks et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2014 · 2.2K citations · Full text
Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy and the Risk of Interval Cancer
Michał F. Kamiński, Ewa Kraszewska, Marcin Polkowski et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 2K citations
Medicine, Biostatistics, Oncology +14
Douglas K. Rex, John H. Bond, Sidney J. Winawer et al. · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2002 · 1K citations