Migrant rescue as organized hypocrisy: EU maritime missions offshore Libya between humanitarianism and border control

Eugenio Cusumano

Cooperation and Conflict · 2018 · 208 citations · 32 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Since 2014, Frontex’s Triton and the 2015 EUNAVFOR Med missions have publicly highlighted maritime search and rescue, yet their actions have not consistently matched this rhetoric. This article examines the discrepancy between the EU missions’ humanitarian rhetoric and their operational focus on curbing irregular migration, labeling it organized hypocrisy. By decoupling rhetoric from action, the missions reconciled European governments’ desire to reduce migrant arrivals with the normative duty to prevent loss of life at sea. The missions conducted few search and rescue operations, prioritizing border control and anti‑smuggling, which produced negative externalities that hampered effective management of the humanitarian crisis offshore Libya.

Abstract

In November 2014, Frontex started its Southern Mediterranean border monitoring operation Triton, followed in June 2015 by the Common Security and Defence Policy anti-smuggling mission EU Naval Force Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR Med) ‘Sophia’. Both operations’ outward communication has placed considerable emphasis on the conduct of maritime search and rescue. Still, this commitment was not matched by consistent action. Triton and EUNAVFOR Med have conducted a relatively limited number of search and rescue operations, prioritizing border control and anti-smuggling tasks. This article explains the gap between the European Union missions’ humanitarian rhetoric and an operational conduct primarily focusing on curbing irregular migration as a form of organized hypocrisy. Decoupling talk and action allowed Triton and EUNAVFOR Med to reconcile the conflicting expectations arising from European governments’ willingness to reduce migrant arrivals and the normative imperative to act against the loss of life at sea. However, the European Union missions’ organized hypocrisy had several negative externalities, hindering effective management of the humanitarian crisis offshore Libya.

References

32