Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery · 2018 · 27 citations · 24 references
MedicinePlastic SurgerySurgeryInfection PreventionMedical MicrobiologyReconstructive SurgeryBreast AugmentationBreast ReconstructionBreast SurgeryImplant-associated InfectionSurgical Infection ManagementSurgical Site InfectionComplications Of Allograft UseImplant-based Breast AugmentationImplant-based Breast ReconstructionInfection Risk FactorsMicrobiology Of Implant-associated InfectionProsthetic Breast ReconstructionProsthetic InfectionSurgical Site Infection After Implantation
BACKGROUND: Infection following augmentation and prosthetic-based breast reconstruction can cause significant physical and psychological distress for patients. It may delay adjuvant therapies and compromise aesthetic outcomes. The aim of this study is to identify modifiable risk factors for infection and identify common bacterial isolates to achieve optimal outcomes for patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed for patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction over a 2-year period. In each case, we documented demographics, co-morbidities, complications and antibiotic use. We reviewed treatments, infectious species cultured where applicable and all outcomes. RESULTS: = 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed drain use and elevated body mass index (BMI) as risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 2.427 and 1.061, respectively). After controlling for BMI, smoking status and radiation, we found an increased odd of infection with allograft use (OR 1.838) and a decreased odd with skin preparation using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl (OR 0.554), though not statistically significant. Forty of 55 patients with infections had cultures, with 62.5% of isolates being Gram-positive species and 30% Gram-negative species. The median time to clinical infection was 25 days. Implant salvage with surgical interventions was achieved in 61.5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified judicious use of drains and efficiency in the operating room as modifiable risk factors for infections following implant-based breast reconstruction. Prospective trials to analyse techniques for infection prevention are warranted. Implant salvage following infection is a possible end-point in the appropriate patient.
24
Chlorhexidine–Alcohol versus Povidone–Iodine for Surgical-Site Antisepsis
Rabih O. Darouiche, Matthew J. Wall, Kamal M.F. Itani et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2010 · 1.5K citations · Full text
Complications Leading to Surgery after Breast Implantation
Sherine E. Gabriel, John E. Woods, W. Michael O’Fallon et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1997 · 447 citations · Full text
Medicine, Plastic Surgery, Surgery +15