Concepedia

Outcomes after use of covered stents to treat coronary artery perforations. Comparison of old and new‐generation covered stents

Marco Hernández‐Enríquez, Olivier Lairez, Francisco Campelo‐Parada, Thibault Lhermusier, Frédéric Bouisset, Jérôme Roncalli, Meyer Elbaz, Didier Carrié, Nicolas Boudou

Journal of Interventional Cardiology · 2018 · 45 citations · 16 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

Time to deliver was shorter with the PL-CS and resulted in lower rate of pericardial effusion and cardiac arrest. However, there were no significant differences in procedural success and 1-year follow-up MACE in patients treated with PL-CS or PTFE-CS.

References

16

Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).

Thomas J. Ryan, David P. Faxon, R M Gunnar et al. · Circulation · 1988 · 2.1K citations · Full text

, , +8

Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome.

Sam Ellis, Steven Ajluni, Anita Zeiler Arnold et al. · Circulation · 1994 · 698 citations

Thrombosis in Coronary Drug-Eluting Stents

Warren K. Laskey, Clyde W. Yancy, William H. Maisel · Circulation · 2007 · 208 citations

, , +8

Incidence, Predictors, Management, Immediate and Long-Term Outcomes Following Grade III Coronary Perforation

Rasha Al‐Lamee, Alfonso Ielasi, Azeem Latib et al. · JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions · 2011 · 202 citations

, , +9

Emergency Polytetrafluoroethylene-Covered Stent Implantation to Treat Coronary Ruptures

Carlo Briguori, Takahiro Nishida, Angelo Anzuini et al. · Circulation · 2000 · 188 citations · Full text