Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · 2018 · 30 citations · 19 references
PharmacyInfectious DiseasesPharmacotherapyAntimicrobial PharmacotherapyCost-effectiveness AnalysisPharmacoeconomic ModelingAntibiotic Use In Older AdultsAntimicrobial De-escalationDe-escalation Of Antimicrobial TherapyEmpiric Antimicrobial TherapyClostridioides Difficile Infection TreatmentHealth System PerspectiveHospitalization CostsQaly CalculationQaly GainsRecurrenceRecurrent Clostridioides Difficile InfectionSemi-markov Modelling
Objectives: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. Methods: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatment-sequence model with nine health states and a 1 year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. The model was based on a healthcare system perspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient). While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (£1356 versus £260/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; £10 815 versus £11 459/patient) and lower costs of managing adverse events (£694 versus £1199/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost £53 less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000/QALY was 76% in these patients. Conclusions: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients.
19
Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Scientific ed ) · 1958 · 2.5K citations
Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin for <i>Clostridium difficile</i> Infection
Thomas Louie, Mark A. Miller, Kathleen M. Mullane et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 1.6K citations · Full text
S. B. Debast, Martijn P. Bauer, Ed J. Kuijper · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · 2013 · 1.2K citations · Full text
Oliver A. Cornely, Derrick W. Crook, Roberto Esposito et al. · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2012 · 752 citations · Full text
2015 · 644 citations