Higher education mobilities: a cross-national European comparison

Rachel Brooks

Geoforum · 2018 · 85 citations · 33 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

European higher education student mobility patterns differ across space, yet share common motivations and are shaped by EU initiatives such as Erasmus and the European Higher Education Area. This article investigates how six European nations’ policy documents frame student mobility, focusing on convergence and divergence in policy goals. The authors analyze 92 policy documents to compare the scale of desired mobility, the imagined mobile subject, social justice concerns, and the prioritization of outward mobility. The study raises questions about policy convergence and the apparent homogenization of European higher education systems toward an Anglo‑American model.

Abstract

Within the extant literature on patterns of mobility of European higher education students there is some recognition that these differ across geographical space – in relation to variations in national uptake of the European Union's Erasmus scheme, for example. However, strong similarities are also often identified – about the way in which mobility is desired by students, higher education institutions and national governments, and how this is stimulated, in part, by various European initiatives such as the commitment to forging a European Higher Education Area. Moreover, while scholars have critiqued normative expectations of mobility – pointing out, for example, that not all students have the necessary social, cultural and economic resources to support a period of study abroad – there has been less critical focus on the way in which constructions of the 'mobile student' vary spatially. This article draws on a dataset of 92 policy documents from six European nations to argue that, while some convergence is notable, particularly in relation to the ways in which student mobility is placed centre-stage within internationalisation strategies, key differences are also evident – with respect to: the scale of desired mobility; the characteristics of the imagined 'mobile subject'; the extent to which social justice concerns are brought into play; and the prioritisation given to outward mobility. These raise important questions about the degree of 'policy convergence' across Europe and the ostensible homogenisation of European higher education systems around an Anglo-American model.

References

33