Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2018 · 104 citations · 38 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyCervical CancerCervical ImagingDiffusion ImagingMedical ImagingTumor CharacterizationTumor ImagingApparent Diffusion Coefficient AnalysisCervical Tumor GradingHistopathological Tumor ClassificationRadiomicsSquamous Cell Carcinoma HistologyTumor Diffusion ImagingTumor Grade AssessmentTumor Grade Classification
Background The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)‐based radiomics features in evaluating histopathological grade of cervical cancer is unresolved. Purpose To determine if there is a difference between radiomics features derived from center‐slice 2D versus whole‐tumor volumetric 3D for ADC measurements in patients with cervical cancer regarding tumor histopathological grade, and systematically assess the impact of the b value on radiomics analysis in ADC quantifications. Study Type Prospective. Subjects In all, 160 patients with histopathologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix. Field Strength/Sequence Conventional and diffusion‐weighted MR images (b values = 0, 800, 1000 s/mm 2 ) were acquired on a 3.0T MR scanner. Assessment Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn manually along the margin of tumor on each slice, and then the center slice of the tumor was selected with naked eyes in the course of whole‐tumor segmentation. A total of 624 radiomics features were derived from T 2 ‐weighted images and ADC maps. We randomly selected 50 cases and did the reproducibility analysis. Statistical Tests Parameters were compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test, Bland–Altman analysis, t ‐test, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression with crossvalidation. Results In all, 95 radiomics features were insensitive to ROI variation among T 2 images, ADC map of b800, and ADC map of b1000 ( P > 0.0002). There was a significant statistical difference between the performances of 2D center‐slice and 3D whole‐tumor radiomics models in both ADC feature sets of b800 and b1000 ( P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001). Compared with ADC features of b800 (0.3758 ± 0.0118), the model of b1000 ADC features appeared to be slightly lower in overall misclassification error (0.3642 ± 0.0162) ( P = 0.0076). Data Conclusion Several radiomics features extracted from T 2 images and ADC maps were highly reproducible. Whole‐tumor volumetric 3D radiomics analysis had a better performance than using the 2D center‐slice of tumor in stratifying the histological grade of cervical cancer. A b value of 1000 s/mm 2 is suggested as the optimal parameter in pelvic DWI scans. Level of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:280–290.
38
Global cancer statistics, 2012
Lindsey A. Torre, Freddie Bray, Rebecca L. Siegel et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2015 · 27.4K citations · Full text
Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species
Lee R. Dice · Ecology · 1945 · 11.9K citations
Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data
Robert J. Gillies, Paul E. Kinahan, Hedvig Hricak · Radiology · 2015 · 8.3K citations