Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets

210

Citations

86

References

2018

Year

TLDR

Co‑working spaces have proliferated worldwide for over a decade, supporting an invisible freelance workforce that lacks social protections and aligning with informal urban practices that have risen amid housing shortages, welfare retrenchment, and austerity. The paper examines co‑working as a critical urban practice that supports the growing freelance workforce in culture and creative industries, using informality to highlight ongoing informalisation of employment relationships and working practices. The study frames co‑working as a collective self‑help and self‑organisation practice that seeks to cope with and potentially overcome the informality, uncertainty, and risks inherent in independent creative work.

Abstract

For more than a decade, co-working spaces have proliferated in cities worldwide. The paper discusses co-working as a critical urban practice because these spaces give support to the rising number of freelance workers in culture and creative industries. Freelance workers are an ‘invisible’ workforce whose impact often remains ‘hidden’ (Mould et al., 2014), who are not sufficiently protected through social welfare regulations and do not enjoy the same social entitlements as employed workers. This paper uses the concept of informality to highlight ongoing informalisation processes of employment relationships as well as informal working practices in creative labour markets. It discusses the emergence of co-working as a practice of collective self-help and self-organisation to cope with and to potentially overcome the informality, uncertainty and risks associated with independent work. It argues that co-working can be seen in line with other practices of informal urbanism that become more prevalent in European and North American cities because of the lack of affordable housing, the retrenchment of the social welfare state and the imposed conditions of ‘austerity urbanism’ (Peck, 2012).

References

YearCitations

Page 1