<i>Vigilante Publics</i>: Orientalism, Modernity and Hindutva Fascism in India

Shakuntala Banaji

Javnost - The Public · 2018 · 142 citations · 19 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The paper situates Hindutva fascism within a broader context of audiovisual propaganda that rewrites history, amplifies caste‑based cow‑protection rhetoric, and co‑opts Western market interests, thereby shaping a split Indian public and a neoliberal‑touristic sensibility. The study investigates how Hindutva fascist repertoires intertwine with quasi‑orientalist discourses in India. The analysis finds that democratic rhetoric, technology, and cow‑protection laws are co‑opted to mask a far‑right Hindutva regime, rationalizing violence against dissenters and fostering a vigilante citizenship that mobilises both ethnic violence and its defence.

Abstract

This paper explores the interconnections of Hindutva fascist repertoires in India and quasi-orientalist discourses. History and common sense are re-written through audiovisual communications to appeal to one section of a dangerously split Indian public and a neoliberal-touristic sensibility elsewhere. Enlightenment rhetorics of progress, democracy and technological development are apparently embodied by WhatsApp groups, electronic voting machines and laws to protect cows. Voting—as a marker of democratic citizenship—becomes a masquerade protecting a resurgent far right Hindutva (Hindu fascist) regime under the aegis of Narendra Modi and the BJP. Caste Hinduism's association of cows with deities, and the proscription on meat-eating in certain versions of religious practice, are used as pretexts for unimaginable violence against Muslims, Christians, Dalits, and working class/lower caste Hindus. Violence against those who dissent is rationalised as patriotic. Hindutva's banal and spectacular audiovisual discourse overwhelms public communication. Its consequences are a form of vigilante citizenship that is marked on the bodies of dead victims and of vigilante publics ready to be mobilised either in ethno-cultural violence or its defence and disavowal. Meanwhile, attracted to India as an enormous market, Western governments and corporations have colluded with the Hindutva regime's self-promotion as a bastion of development.

References

19