Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · 2018 · 30 citations · 36 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyBiomedical ImagingDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyDiffusion ImagingMedical ImagingPancreatic CancerPancreatic PathologyTumor CharacterizationTumor ImagingApparent Diffusion Coefficient AnalysisDiagnostic Performance MetricsInstitutional Review Board ApprovalIntravoxel Incoherent Motion ImagingPancreatic Cancer DetectionPancreatic Cancer ImagingPancreatic Lesion EvaluationTumor Diffusion Imaging
Background: The aim of this study was to compare intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) parameters such as standard apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCstandard), pure diffusion coefficient (Dslow), pseudodiffusion coefficient (Dfast) and perfusion fraction (ƒ) for differentiating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with different pathological grades. Methods: Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved this study protocol. Subjects comprised 38 PDACs confirmed by pathology. Pancreatic multiple b values DWI with 15 b values of 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200, 400, 800, 1,000, 1200, 1,500, and 2,000 s/mm2 was performed using GE Discovery MR750 3.0T scanner. ADCstandard, Dslow, Dfast and ƒ values of all PDACs were calculated using mono- and bi-exponential models. Parameters of well/moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated PDAC were compared using Independent Sample t-test. P values <0.05 were considered significant. Results: Mean Dslow value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly lower than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (0.540×10−3vs. 0.676×10−3 mm2/s, P<0.001). Mean ƒ value of well/moderately differentiated PDAC was significantly higher than that of poorly differentiated PDAC (60.3% vs. 38.4%, P<0.001). The area under curve value of ƒ in differentiating well/moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC was slightly higher than that of Dslow (0.894>0.865). When the Dslow value was less than or equal to 0.599×10−3 mm2/s, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 84.6% respectively. When ƒ value was greater than 49.6%, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.0% and 84.6% respectively. Conclusions: Dslow and ƒ derived from IVIM-DWI model can be used to distinguish well/moderately differentiated PDAC from poorly differentiated PDAC. And to serve this purpose, Dslow and ƒ have high diagnostic performance. IVIM-DWI is a promising and non-invasive tool for predicting pathological grade of PDAC.
36
Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca L. Siegel, Elizabeth Ward et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2009 · 9.7K citations · Full text
Denis Le Bihan, D Lallemand, P. Grenier et al. · Radiology · 1986 · 3.9K citations
Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging.
Denis Le Bihan, D Lallemand, Michèle Aubin et al. · Radiology · 1988 · 3.2K citations