Comparison of the RGD Motif–Containing α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub>Integrin–Binding Peptides SFLAP3 and SFITGv6 for Diagnostic Application in HNSCC

Saskia Roesch, Thomas Lindner, Max Sauter, Anastasia Loktev, Paul Flechsig, Martin Müller, Walter Mier, Rolf Warta, Gerhard Dyckhoff, Christel Herold‐Mende,

Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2018 · 49 citations · 22 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Abstract

α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin is overexpressed by several carcinomas and thus considered a target for diagnostic imaging and anticancer therapies. Recently, we presented the α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin-binding peptide SFITGv6 as a novel potential tracer for imaging and targeted therapy of α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin-positive carcinomas. Here, we analyzed the affinity and specificity of 5 native α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin-specific binders in comparison to SFITGv6. <b>Methods:</b> Sunflower trypsin inhibitor 1 (SFTI1)-based peptides containing arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) motif-spanning octamers of fibronectin (SFFN1), tenascin C (SFTNC), vitronectin (SFVTN), and latency-associated peptides (LAP) 1 (SFLAP1) and 3 (SFLAP3) were synthesized, and their binding potential to α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin-expressing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines was evaluated. Subsequently, stability, affinity, and specificity were assessed in vitro using radio-high-pressure liquid chromatography, surface plasmon resonance assay, and binding experiments including competition, kinetics, internalization, and efflux. α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin binding specificity was further evaluated by peptide histochemistry. Finally, in vivo binding properties were assessed using small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution experiments in HNSCC-bearing mice, and <sup>68</sup>Ga-DOTA-SFLAP3 was applied for diagnostic PET/CT of an HNSCC patient. <b>Results:</b> When the newly designed peptides were compared, significant binding (>20%) to several HNSCC cell lines (HNO97, HNO399, and HNO223) and a fast internalization of up to 60% and 70% were observed for SFLAP3 (GRGDLGRL) and SFITGv6 (FRGDLMQL). In contrast, the other peptides displayed binding that was moderate (SFLAP1, 4.1%-12.1%) to marginal (SFFN1, SFTNC, and SFVTN, <1%) and were therefore excluded from further analysis. Notably, SFLAP3 exhibited improved affinity for α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin (mean half-maximal inhibitory concentration, 3.5 nM; dissociation constant, 7.4). Moreover, small-animal PET imaging and biodistribution studies of HNSCC xenograft mice revealed an increased tumor-specific accumulation 30-60 min after injection of <sup>68</sup>Ga-labeled or <sup>177</sup>Lu-labeled DOTA-SFLAP3. Peptide staining further demonstrated binding specificity for SFLAP3 to HNSCC tumor cells. Finally, PET/CT scanning of an HNSCC patient showed specific SFLAP3 accumulation in the primary tumor lesion (SUV<sub>max</sub>, 5.1) and in corresponding lymph node metastases (SUV<sub>max</sub>, 4.1). <b>Conclusion:</b> SFLAP3 represents a promising tracer for prognostic assessment, diagnostic imaging, and possibly targeted therapy of α<sub>v</sub>β<sub>6</sub> integrin-expressing tumors.

References

22