Relative Robust Portfolio Optimization with benchmark regret

Abstract

We extend Relative Robust Portfolio Optimization models to allow portfolios to optimize their performance when considered relative to a set of benchmarks. We do this in a minimum volatility setting, where we model regret directly as the maximum difference between our volatility and that of a given benchmark. Portfolio managers are also given the option of computing regret as a proportion of the benchmark’s performance, which is more in line with market practice than other approaches suggested in the literature. Furthermore, we propose using regret as an extra constraint rather than as a brand new objective function, so practitioners can maintain their current framework. We also look into how such a triple optimization problem can be solved or at least approximated for a general class of objective functions and uncertainty and benchmark sets. Finally, we illustrate the benefits of this approach by examining its performance against other common methods in the literature in several equity markets.