Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2018 · 53 citations · 27 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyAntimicrobial StewardshipDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingCarbapenem ResistanceComparative Diagnostic MicrobiologyDiagnostic BacteriologyInfectious Disease DetectionPathogen DetectionAntibiotic Resistance TestingCarbapenem AntibioticsCarbapenem Resistance MechanismsCarbapenemase EnzymesComparative EvaluationEnterobacteriaceae DetectionPhenotypic Resistance Detection
carbapenemase (KPC) detection (sensitivity, 71.3%). For mCIM, the best performance was observed with the meropenem disk. The MHT exhibited the worst performance, with a specificity of 88.8%. All assays except 1-h-incubation MHA, which failed to identify 68 KPC-2s, had a sensitivity of >98% in the detection of 172 KPCs. Likewise, all assays had a sensitivity of >95% in the detection of 70 class B carbapenemases, except for MHT (82.9%). The 2-h-incubation MHA significantly improved the accuracy in CPE detection compared with that for 1-h incubation and performed the best in the detection of class A and B carbapenemases. Our findings suggest that the MHA is the most practical assay for carbapenemase detection. For those who cannot afford the associated equipment, both the Carba NP test and mCIM are good alternatives with regard to the practical requirements of time and cost.
27
Pranita D. Tamma, Katherine E Goodman, Anthony Harris et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2016 · 402 citations · Full text