The influence of context in the subjective evaluation of “negative” alcohol-related consequences.

Abstract

tests were used to compare evaluation ratings, averaged across consequences, under different hypothetical contextual conditions (e.g., among friends vs. strangers). Out of 16 contextual comparisons, all but one (first-time vs. repeated consequence) revealed significant differences in subjective evaluations; the pattern held in reduced samples of just drinkers or just heavy drinkers. Examples include that consequences were viewed more negatively (a) if occurring at either a party or bar versus alone in one's home/dorm, (b) if friends express concern versus find it funny, (c) if the consequence was expected versus unexpected, and (d) if there are lasting consequences versus none. When using recent consequences in feedback-based interventions to build motivation to change, it may be useful to discuss the context of a consequence and how this influences the perceived aversiveness of that consequence. (PsycINFO Database Record