Publication | Closed Access
Performance of Silica Nanoparticles in CO2 Foam for EOR and CCUS at Tough Reservoir Conditions
48
Citations
23
References
2019
Year
EngineeringNanoporous MaterialChemistryChemical EngineeringCo2-foam InjectionsNanoengineeringPorous MediaCarbon AerogelsCo2 Miscible FloodingMaterials ScienceMolecular SieveCarbon SequestrationCo2 Immiscible FloodingNanomanufacturingCo2 FoamOil ProductionEnhanced Oil RecoveryFoamChemical Enhanced Oil RecoveryPorous CarbonNanomaterialsTough Reservoir ConditionsEnhanced Oil ProductionSilica Nanoparticles
Summary The use of nanoparticles for CO2-foam mobility is an upcoming technology for carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) in mature fields. Silane-modified hydrophilic silica nanoparticles enhance the thermodynamic stability of CO2 foam at elevated temperatures and salinities and in the presence of oil. The aqueous nanofluid mixes with CO2 in the porous media to generate CO2 foam for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) by improving sweep efficiency, resulting in reduced carbon footprint from oil production by the geological storage of anthropogenic CO2. Our objective was to investigate the stability of commercially available silica nanoparticles for a range of temperatures and brine salinities to determine if nanoparticles can be used in CO2-foam injections for EOR and underground CO2 storage in high-temperature reservoirs with high brine salinities. The experimental results demonstrated that surface-modified nanoparticles are stable and able to generate CO2 foam at elevated temperatures (60 to 120°C) and extreme brine salinities (20 wt% NaCl). We find that (1) nanofluids remain stable at extreme salinities (up to 25 wt% total dissolved solids) with the presence of both monovalent (NaCl) and divalent (CaCl2) ions; (2) both pressure gradient and incremental oil recovery during tertiary CO2-foam injections were 2 to 4 times higher with nanoparticles compared with no-foaming agent; and (3) CO2 stored during CCUS with nanoparticle-stabilized CO2 foam increased by more than 300% compared with coinjections without nanoparticles.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1