American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · 2018 · 11 citations · 21 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryMovement AnalysisOrthopedicsShoulder SurgeryOrthopedic ExaminationShoulder AnatomyShoulder BiomechanicsShoulder DisordersShoulder Impingement SyndromeAcromioclavicular Joint ImagingImpingement AnatomyIn Vivo ImagingInternal Shoulder ImpingementMagnetic ResonanceShoulder Impingement BiomechanicsShoulder Joint AssessmentShoulder Joint Mechanics
OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to evaluate subacromial and internal impingement risk between shoulders (dominant/nondominant) during dynamic motion using subject-specific anatomy and precise in vivo kinematics. DESIGN: In a prospective cross-sectional study, nine subjects underwent bilateral magnetic resonance (N = 18 shoulders) and fluoroscopic imaging during elevation and external rotation at 90 degrees of abduction. Subject-specific bone models were created and distances from footprint to (a) acromion and (b) glenoid were measured to evaluate risk. RESULTS: Throughout elevation, subacromial impingement risk was greater in the dominant shoulder (P = 0.0178). Regardless of side, high subacromial impingement risk occurred at 30% (78 degrees), 50% (101 degrees), and 70% (57 degrees) of the elevation cycle (P < 0.0001). High subacromial impingement risk also occurred at 30% (94 degrees), 50% (120 degrees), and 70% (63 degrees) of the external rotation motion cycle (P < 0.0001). Throughout both motions, internal impingement risk was not observed; however, the footprint and glenoid were closest at 50% of the elevation (101 degrees) and external rotation (120 degrees) cycles (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: During elevation, subacromial impingement risk is greatest at lower arm positions (30% cycle, 78 degrees) and is greater in the dominant shoulder. High subacromial impingement risk also occurs with external rotation (63-120 degrees). Internal impingement risk does not occur with maximal elevation (101 degrees) or external rotation at 90-degree abduction but is more closely approached with elevation.
21
A Clinical Method for Identifying Scapular Dyskinesis, Part 1: Reliability
Philip McClure, Angela Tate, Stephen Kareha et al. · Journal of Athletic Training · 2009 · 482 citations · Full text
Philip A. Davidson, Neal S. ElAttrache, Christopher M. Jobe et al. · Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery · 1995 · 231 citations