Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology · 2018 · 42 citations · 10 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyRadiation DosimetryRadiation ProtectionTreatment PlanningAbsorbed DoseDose CalculationRadiation TherapyRadiation Treatment PlanningTreatment Planning Dose CalculationTreatment Planning PhysicsAbsorbed Dose-to-water DeterminationRadiotherapy Dose PlanningTreatment Planning Dosimetry
Background and purposeConversion factors between dose to medium (Dm,m) and dose to water (Dw,w) provided by treatment planning systems that model the patient as water with variable electron density are currently based on stopping power ratios. In the current paper it will be illustrated that this conversion method is not correct.Materials and methodsMonte Carlo calculations were performed in a phantom consisting of a 2 cm bone layer surrounded by water. Dw,w was obtained by modelling the bone layer as water with the electron density of bone. Conversion factors between Dw,w and Dm,m were obtained and compared to stopping power ratios and ratios of mass-energy absorption coefficients in regions of electronic equilibrium and interfaces. Calculations were performed for 6 MV and 20 MV photon beams.ResultsIn the region of electronic equilibrium the stopping power ratio of water to bone (1.11) largely overestimates the conversion obtained using the Monte Carlo calculations (1.06). In that region the MC dose conversion corresponds to the ratio of mass energy absorption coefficients. Near the water to bone interface, the MC ratio cannot be determined from stopping powers or mass energy absorption coefficients.ConclusionStopping power ratios cannot be used for conversion from Dm,m to Dw,w provided by treatment planning systems that model the patient as water with variable electron density, either in regions of electronic equilibrium or near interfaces. In regions of electronic equilibrium mass energy absorption coefficient ratios should be used. Conversions at interfaces require detailed MC calculations.
10
Monte Carlo treatment planning for photon and electron beams
N. Reynaert, S.C. van der Marck, Dennis R. Schaart et al. · Radiation Physics and Chemistry · 2006 · 156 citations