Journal of Automated Reasoning · 2018 · 12 citations · 10 references
ComputingComputer ScienceMathematicsAlgorithmsLogicTheory Of ComputationAutomated ReasoningDeductive ReasoningPredicate LogicProof ComplexityTheorem ProvingAutomated Theorem ProvingEmpirical EvaluationLogic DecompositionProof Complexity Of Sequent CalculusQuantifier EliminationQuantifier HandlingUnification
In this paper we present an algorithmic method of lemma introduction. Given a proof in predicate logic with equality the algorithm is capable of introducing several universal lemmas. The method is based on an inversion of Gentzen’s cut-elimination method for sequent calculus. The first step consists of the computation of a compact representation (a so-called decomposition) of Herbrand instances in a cut-free proof. Given a decomposition the problem of computing the corresponding lemmas is reduced to the solution of a second-order unification problem (the solution conditions). It is shown that that there is always a solution of the solution conditions, the canonical solution. This solution yields a sequence of lemmas and, finally, a proof based on these lemmas. Various techniques are developed to simplify the canonical solution resulting in a reduction of proof complexity. Moreover, the paper contains a comprehensive empirical evaluation of the implemented method and gives an application to a mathematical proof.
10
Productive use of failure in inductive proof
Andrew Ireland, Alan Bundy · Journal of Automated Reasoning · 1996 · 164 citations · Full text
Lower bounds on Herbrand’s theorem
Rick Statman · Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 1979 · 83 citations · Full text
Conjecture Synthesis for Inductive Theories
Moa Johansson, Lucas Dixon, Alan Bundy · Journal of Automated Reasoning · 2010 · 83 citations · Full text