Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · 2018 · 165 citations · 37 references
Social SciencesPolitical CommunicationPolitical ScienceComparative PoliticsPolitical BehaviorPublic OpinionPolitical DiscussionPolitical ExtremismPolitical IdeologySocial Media PoliticsExtremist Group DynamicsFragmentationIdeological AttitudesPolitical FragmentationSocial Media Political Communication
This paper is a systematic large scale study of the reasons driving political fragmentation on social media. Making use of a comparative dataset of the Twitter discussion activities of 115 political groups in 26 countries, it shows that groups which are further apart in ideological terms interact less, and that groups which sit at the extremes of the ideological scale are particularly likely to have lower patterns of interaction. Indeed, exchanges between centrists who sit on different sides of the left-right divide are more likely than connections between centrists and extremists who are from the same ideological wing. In light of the results, theory about exposure to different ideological viewpoints online is discussed and enhanced.
37
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith‐Lovin, James M. Cook · Annual Review of Sociology · 2001 · 18.6K citations
Cass R. Sunstein · Journal of Political Philosophy · 2002 · 1.3K citations
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
Natalie Jomini Stroud · Journal of Communication · 2010 · 1.3K citations