Current Zoology · 2018 · 30 citations · 49 references
Life SciencesBiologyEntomologyInsect BehaviorReproductive BiologySexual SelectionCourtship BehaviorFemale ChoiceMate ChoiceSex DifferencesSex RatioSexual DimorphismChoice TestsCourtship SuccessCourtship TimingFemale Mate ChoiceMate Choice PreferencesMate CopyingMating SuccessSex Ratio Effects On Mate Choice
In many sexually reproducing species, individuals can gather information about potential mates by observing their mating success. This behavioral pattern, that we call mate-copying, was reported in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster where females choosing between 2 males of contrasting phenotypes can build a preference for males of the phenotype they previously saw being chosen by a demonstrator female. As sex ratio is known to affect mate choice, our goal was to test whether mate-copying is also affected by encountered sex ratios. Thus, we created a gradient of sex ratio during demonstrations of mate-copying experiments by changing the number of females observing from a central arena 6 simultaneous demonstrations unfolding in 6 peripheral compartments of a hexagonal device. We also tested whether the sex ratio experienced by females during demonstrations affected their choosiness (male courtship duration and double courtship rate) in subsequent mate-choice tests. Experimental male:female sex ratio during demonstrations did not affect mate-copying indices, but positively affected the proportion of both males courting the female during mate-choice tests, as well as male courtship duration, the latter potentially explaining the former relationship. As expected, the sex ratio affected female choosiness positively, and Drosophila females seem to have evolved a mate-copying ability independently of sex ratio, and a capacity to adapt their choosiness to male availability. This suggests that, as in many animal species, individuals, especially females, can adapt their mate choice depending on the current sex ratio.
49
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using <b>lme4</b>
Douglas M. Bates, Martin Mächler, Benjamin M. Bolker et al. · Journal of Statistical Software · 2015 · 85.6K citations · Full text
Fitting autoregressive models for prediction
Hirotugu Akaike · Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics · 1969 · 2.5K citations
Computing, Mathematics, Forecasting +11
Distinct memory traces for two visual features in the Drosophila brain
Gang Liu, Holger Seiler, Ai Wen et al. · Nature · 2006 · 417 citations
Medicine, Neurobiology, Neuroscience +16