Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2018 · 40 citations · 21 references
EngineeringCivil EngineeringBridge EngineeringComputational MechanicsStructural EngineeringBridge DesignBridge Structural AnalysisStrain SensorsStructural Response AnalysisBending Moment AnalysisBending Moment DistributionBending Moment Influence LinesBridge Deformation MonitoringBridge Health MonitoringDynamic Strain ResponseInfluence Line AnalysisSensor-based Assessment
Conventional bridge weigh-in-motion (BWIM) uses a bridge influence line to find the axle weights of passing vehicles that minimize the sum of squares of differences between theoretical and measured responses. An alternative approach, probabilistic bridge weigh-in-motion (pBWIM), is proposed here. The pBWIM approach uses a probabilistic influence line and seeks to find the most probable axle weights, given the measurements. The inferred axle weights are those with the greatest probability amongst all possible combinations of values. The measurement sensors used in pBWIM are similar to BWIM, containing free-of-axle detector sensors to calculate axle spacings and vehicle speed and weighing sensors to record deformations of the bridge. The pBWIM concept is tested here using a numerical model and a bridge in Slovenia. In a simulation, 200 randomly generated 2-axle trucks pass over a 6 m long simply supported beam. The bending moment at mid-span is used to find the axle weights. In the field tests, 77 pre-weighed trucks traveled over an integral slab bridge and the strain response in the soffit at mid-span was recorded. Results show that pBWIM has good potential to improve the accuracy of BWIM.
21
Recent developments in bridge weigh in motion (B-WIM)
Myra Lydon, Susan Taylor, Desmond Robinson et al. · Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring · 2015 · 198 citations · Full text