Publication | Open Access
Reality testing, conspiracy theories, and paranormal beliefs
99
Citations
0
References
2012
Year
Unknown Venue
Forensic PsychologyParanormal PsychologyJournalismSocial PsychologyBiasUrban LegendsSocial RealitySocial CognitionEpistemologyRelated Anomalistic BeliefsSocial SciencesDeception DetectionArtsReality TestingPost-truthPersuasionPsychologyIrrationality
Recent research has examined the links between conspiracist beliefs, reality testing, and paranormal beliefs. This study investigated how deficits in reality testing, belief in the paranormal, and related anomalistic beliefs (urban legends) relate to attitudes toward general conspiracist beliefs and specific conspiracy theories. The results showed that lower reality testing and higher paranormal belief were strongly correlated with endorsement of general conspiracist beliefs, specific conspiracy theories, and anomalistic beliefs, and that both factors similarly predicted attitudes toward conspiracies.
This study investigated the relationship between conspiracist beliefs, reality testing, belief in the paranormal, and related anomalistic beliefs (urban legends). Attitudes toward general conspiracist beliefs and endorsement of specific conspiracy theories correlated with reality testing deficits and belief in the paranormal. High reality testing deficit scores were associated with less critical ratings of conspiracy theories and increased belief in the paranormal. Regression analysis indicated that reality testing and belief in the paranormal predicted attitudes toward general conspiracist beliefs. Partial correlation revealed that reality testing and belief in the paranormal explained similar amounts of variance; both measures were similarly associated with attitudes toward general conspiracist beliefs. Conspiracist beliefs positively correlated with related anomalistic beliefs (urban legends). Correlations were found between attitudes toward general conspiracist beliefs, conspiracy theory endorsement, and individual conspiracy theory ratings; general attitudes were associated with specific theory endorsement, and belief in one conspiracy theory was associated with belief in others. These findings are discussed in the context of recent research.