Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2017 · 230 citations · 15 references
MedicineOncologyGenitourinary OncologyImmunotherapyMetastasisBiomarkers In Genitourinary CancerCancer BiomarkersCirculating Tumor CellsProstate CancerProstate-specific Antigen TestingTherapy Response AssessmentCastration-resistant Prostate Cancer TherapyCirculating Tumor Cell BiomarkersCirculating Tumor Cell CharacterizationCirculating Tumor Cell EnumerationCirculating Tumor Cell MonitoringMetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate CancerPhase Iii Clinical TrialsPhase Iii Oncology Trials
Purpose Measures of response that are clinically meaningful and occur early are an unmet need in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical research and practice. We explored, using individual patient data, week 13 circulating tumor cell (CTC) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response end points in five prospective randomized phase III trials that enrolled a total of 6,081 patients-COU-AA-301, AFFIRM, ELM-PC-5, ELM-PC-4, and COMET-1- ClinicalTrials.Gov identifiers: NCT00638690, NCT00974311, NCT01193257, NCT01193244, and NCT01605227, respectively. Methods Eight response end points were explored. CTC nonzero at baseline and 0 at 13 weeks (CTC0); CTC conversion (≥ 5 CTCs at baseline, ≤ 4 at 13 weeks-the US Food and Drug Administration cleared response measure); a 30%, 50%, and 70% decrease in CTC count; and a 30%, 50%, and 70% decrease in PSA level. Patients missing week-13 values were considered nonresponders. The discriminatory strength of each end point with respect to overall survival in each trial was assessed using the weighted c-index. Results Of the eight response end points, CTC0 and CTC conversion had the highest weighted c-indices, with smaller standard deviations. For CTC0, the mean (standard deviation) was 0.81 (0.04); for CTC conversion, 0.79 (0.03); for 30% decrease in CTC count, 0.72 (0.06); for 50% decrease in CTC count, 0.72 (0.06); for 70% decrease in CTC count, 0.73 (0.05); for 30% decrease in PSA level, 0.71 (0.03); for 50% decrease in PSA level, 0.72 (0.06); and for 70% decrease in PSA level, 0.74 (0.05). Seventy-five percent of eligible patients could be evaluated with the CTC0 end point, compared with 51% with the CTC conversion end point. Conclusion The CTC0 and CTC conversion end points had the highest discriminatory power for overall survival. Both are robust and meaningful response end points for early-phase metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer clinical trials. CTC0 is applicable to a significantly higher percentage of patients than CTC conversion.
15
Increased Survival with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer after Chemotherapy
Howard I. Scher, Karim Fizazi, Fred Saad et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 4.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +14
Abiraterone and Increased Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Johann S. de Bono, Christopher J. Logothetis, Arturo Molina et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2011 · 4.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Dan R. Robinson, Eliezer M. Van Allen, Yi-Mi Wu et al. · Cell · 2015 · 3.6K citations · Full text