Publication | Closed Access
Effectiveness and Users' Experience of Obfuscation as a Privacy-Enhancing Technology for Sharing Photos
102
Citations
66
References
2017
Year
EngineeringOnline ExperimentInformation SecurityBiometricsInformation ForensicsCommunicationPseudonymizationImage AnalysisPrivacy-enhancing TechnologyPrivacy Enhancing TechnologyData HidingViewing ExperiencePrivacy IssueData PrivacyGraphical RepresentationComputer SciencePrivacy AnonymitySharing PhotosPrivacy ConcernPrivacyComputer VisionData SecurityCryptographySocial ComputingInformation Hiding
Current collaborative photo privacy protection solutions can be categorized into two approaches: controlling the recipient, which restricts certain viewers' access to the photo, and controlling the content, which protects all or part of the photo from being viewed. Focusing on the latter approach, we introduce privacy-enhancing obfuscations for photos and conduct an online experiment with 271 participants to evaluate their effectiveness against human recognition and how they affect the viewing experience. Results indicate the two most common obfuscations, blurring and pixelating, are ineffective. On the other hand, inpainting, which removes an object or person entirely, and avatar, which replaces content with a graphical representation are effective. From a viewer experience perspective, blurring, pixelating, inpainting, and avatar are preferable. Based on these results, we suggest inpainting and avatar may be useful as privacy-enhancing technologies for photos, because they are both effective at increasing privacy for elements of a photo and provide a good viewer experience.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1